In News:

The Union Government has opposed extending the “creamy layer” principle to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) before the Supreme Court. The issue arose after the 2024 seven-judge Constitution Bench judgment in State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh allowed sub-classification within SC/ST reservation quotas and suggested consideration of a mechanism to prevent “elite capture” of reservation benefits.

What is the Creamy Layer Principle?

The creamy layer refers to the relatively advanced sections within a reserved category who are excluded from reservation benefits. The principle was established in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992), which upheld 27% OBC reservation while directing exclusion of the creamy layer. It is currently applied to OBCs, where only Non-Creamy Layer (NCL) candidates are eligible for OBC reservation.

Historically, it has not been applied to SCs/STs, whose disadvantaged status is constitutionally linked to historical caste oppression, untouchability, social stigma and, in the case of many ST communities, geographical isolation, rather than economic deprivation alone.

Sub-Categorisation vs Creamy Layer

These are distinct mechanisms:

• Sub-categorisation: Divides an existing SC/ST quota among different sub-groups to ensure that relatively more marginalised communities receive a fair share.
• Creamy layer exclusion: Identifies relatively advanced individuals within a reserved category and excludes them from reservation benefits.
• States such as Telangana, Haryana, Punjab and Andhra Pradesh have experience with SC sub-classification, while Mizoram has sub-categorised the ST quota.
• The Centre also uses ST sub-categorisation in Eklavya Model Residential School admissions to ensure representation of PVTGs.

Why Has the Centre Opposed Creamy Layer for SC/STs?

The government argues that economic advancement does not necessarily eliminate caste-based discrimination. A financially successful SC/ST individual may continue to face social exclusion and lack of social and cultural capital.

It also raises constitutional and institutional concerns. Articles 341(2) and 342(2) provide that changes to the Presidential Lists of SCs and STs can be made only by Parliament by law. The Centre argues that judicially imposing exclusion could potentially interfere with this constitutional framework. However, the Jarnail Singh judgment (2018) held that excluding a creamy layer does not, by itself, alter the Presidential Lists.

The government has also stressed the need for empirical socio-economic data before identifying relatively advanced sections within SC/ST communities. The upcoming Census 2027, which includes caste enumeration, may provide additional data, although its results are not yet available