In News:

The renewed demand by Denotified, Nomadic and Semi-Nomadic Tribes (DNTs) for constitutional recognition and a separate column in the 2027 Census has brought long-standing issues of historical injustice, administrative invisibility and socio-economic exclusion back into national focus. These demands are not merely symbolic; they seek to correct structural gaps that have persisted since the colonial era.

Historical Background

Denotified Tribes are communities that were once labelled as “criminal tribes” under the colonial Criminal Tribes Act, 1871. The law empowered the British administration to brand entire communities as criminal by birth, subjecting them to constant surveillance, restricted mobility and deep social stigma. Amendments in 1924 further institutionalised this discrimination. After Independence, the Act was repealed in 1952 and the affected communities were officially “denotified”. However, the removal of the legal label did not erase entrenched prejudice. The stigma of criminality continued through policing practices, social exclusion and economic marginalisation.

Socio-Economic Conditions

Today, DNTs remain among the most deprived sections of Indian society. Many follow nomadic or semi-nomadic lifestyles, which severely limits access to land ownership, stable housing, ration cards, caste certificates and welfare schemes. Educational indicators are particularly alarming, with studies and official committees reporting extremely low literacy and school completion rates in several DNT communities. Livelihoods are often confined to informal labour, traditional occupations or seasonal migration, exposing them to exploitation, insecure incomes and lack of social protection.

Administrative Classification Gaps

Unlike Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), DNTs do not enjoy a dedicated constitutional schedule. Over time, some communities were absorbed into SC, ST or OBC categories, while others were left completely unclassified. The Idate Commission (2017) identified around 1,200 denotified, nomadic and semi-nomadic communities, of which nearly 267 were not included in any constitutional category. Even those included within SC, ST or OBC lists often struggle to access benefits due to competition with relatively better-off groups. The absence of reliable population data has resulted in policy invisibility and weak targeting of welfare measures.

Government Measures and Their Limits

The Union government has introduced schemes such as the Scheme for Economic Empowerment of DNTs (SEED), covering education, health insurance, housing and livelihood support. However, implementation has been weak. Between 2020 and 2025, actual expenditure under SEED remained far below allocations, largely due to the absence of proper DNT certification by States and Union Territories. This highlights governance and delivery failures rather than lack of need.

Current Demands and Significance

In the context of the 2027 Census, DNT communities have demanded a separate Census column and code to ensure explicit enumeration. The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment has recommended their inclusion to the Office of the Registrar General of India, which has agreed in principle. However, community leaders argue that inclusion without a distinct category risks continued statistical erasure.

There is also a growing call for constitutional recognition through a separate Schedule, similar to SCs and STs. Additionally, demands for sub-classification within DNTs seek to acknowledge graded backwardness between settled and nomadic groups, drawing support from recent Supreme Court of India judgments permitting sub-classification within reserved categories.

Way Forward

A separate Census entry would generate credible population data, enabling targeted welfare policies, adequate budgetary allocation and improved political representation. Constitutional recognition would acknowledge historical injustice and provide a firm legal basis for affirmative action. Without these reforms, Denotified Tribes risk remaining trapped between categories—unable to compete within existing reservation frameworks, yet lacking an identity of their own. Addressing their demands is thus essential to fulfilling the constitutional promise of equality, dignity and social justice.