In News:

Migration has been a central feature of India’s socio-economic evolution, but the growing exodus of rural youth to urban centres signals deep developmental imbalances. While migration is natural in a dynamic economy, its scale—particularly among young people—highlights failures in generating dignified rural livelihoods, aligning education with market needs, and creating resilient local ecosystems.

Understanding the Scale and Nature of Youth Migration

• Magnitude: Nearly 29% of India’s population are migrants; 89% originate from rural areas.
• Age Profile: Over half of all migrants are aged 15–25, indicating the loss of India’s most productive demographic.
• Pandemic Exposure: The 2020 Covid-19 lockdown forced 40 million workers to return home, revealing the fragility of informal urban employment.
• Gender Dynamics: Men migrate mainly for work, while 86.8% of women migrate due to marriage, reflecting persistent social norms.
• Socio-economic Profile: Higher migration rates among SC, OBC, and low-income groups show distress-driven mobility.

Drivers of Youth Migration from Rural India

a. Rural Employment Deficit

• Limited non-farm jobs; 49% migrants work as daily wagers and 39% in temporary industrial roles.
• Low returns from agriculture due to fragmented landholdings and climate exposure.

b. Education–Employment Mismatch

• Rural education lacks industry-relevant skills.
• Graduate unemployment exceeds 15% (CMIE 2024), indicating inadequate employability.

c. Income and Infrastructure Gaps

• Rural incomes fail to meet basic needs.
• Weak connectivity, inadequate credit access, and poor logistics hinder local enterprise formation.

d. Urban Pull Factors

• Cities offer perceived opportunities, higher wages, and mobility.
• However, migrants face unsafe housing, exploitation, and precarious informal jobs—88% lack social security.

Impact of Migration on Rural and Urban Landscapes

a. Urban Challenges

• Overcrowding, pollution, rising pressure on housing and infrastructure.
• Growth of slums in megacities like Delhi and Mumbai.

b. Rural Depopulation

• Loss of youth weakens agricultural productivity and local governance.
• Declining rural social capital affects community cohesion.

c. Social and Psychological Effects

• Family separation leads to stress, anxiety, and economic insecurity among dependents.
• Women migrants rarely enter the workforce, deepening gender gaps.

Policy Interventions and Initiatives

• MGNREGA ensures wage support during lean seasons, reducing distress migration.
• DDU-GKY, PMKVY provide vocational training to improve employability.
• PM-Mudra, Start-Up India, SVEP encourage rural entrepreneurship.
• 10,000 FPO initiative strengthens farmer collectives and value chains.
• BharatNet, PMGSY, rural BPOs expand digital and physical connectivity.

Way Forward: Reimagining Rural Education and Ecosystems

a. Integrating Education with Local Economies

• Embed vocational, digital, and agri-tech skills into rural curricula.
• Link schools and colleges to local enterprises and industries.

b. Diversifying Rural Non-Farm Sectors

• Develop employment in handicrafts, food processing, logistics, renewable energy, and agri-tourism.

c. Building Digital Ecosystems

• Invest in 5G connectivity, e-commerce platforms, tele-work hubs, and digital service centres.

d. Encouraging Local Entrepreneurship

• Promote success stories like Raigad’s BalaramBandagale to inspire reverse migration and rural innovation.

e. Strengthening Social Protection

• Ensure universal portability of PDS, health insurance, and pensions for mobile workers.

Conclusion

India must shift from a model where migration is a compulsion to one where it becomes a choice. Strengthening rural education, diversifying local economies, and empowering youth with market-ready skills can address structural causes of migration. A balanced rural–urban development framework—anchored in employment-linked learning, digital connectivity, and entrepreneurship—will help revitalise rural India and support inclusive, sustainable growth.