Indian Constitution at 76: Enduring Relevance of a Transformative Charter

  • 27 Nov 2025

In News:

As India marks the 76th anniversary of the adoption of the Constitution, it invites renewed reflection on the vision, depth and contemporary relevance of a document that sought to transform a deeply unequal society. Drafted in the aftermath of colonial rule, the Indian Constitution was not merely a legal framework to limit state power; it was a social revolution embedded in constitutional form. Even after seven decades, it continues to outpace many Western constitutional models in its scope, ambition and adaptability.

From its inception, the Indian Constitution was ahead of its time. It adopted universal adult franchise in 1950, at a moment when several established democracies such as the United States and Australia still denied voting rights to large sections of their populations. Unlike liberal constitutions that focused primarily on formal equality, India confronted entrenched social hierarchies, particularly caste, through explicit constitutional provisions. Articles 15(2), 17 and 23 addressed discrimination, untouchability and bonded labour, extending constitutional scrutiny beyond the state to private and social domains. Further, the institutionalisation of affirmative action for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes at the founding stage was a bold acknowledgment that political equality alone could not remedy historical injustice.

In contrast to many Western constitutional models, which largely evolved as instruments to restrain sovereign power, the Indian Constitution functioned as a transformative tool. It recognised that oppression in India often stemmed from society itself—through caste, patriarchy and community dominance—and therefore required group-differentiated protections. Minority cultural and educational rights under Articles 29 and 30, and the integration of Directive Principles of State Policy, reflected a commitment to substantive equality and socio-economic restructuring. While Western democracies incorporated anti-discrimination safeguards largely in the 1960s and 1970s, India embedded them in the original constitutional text through Articles 14 to 17.

The evolution of the Constitution since 1950 has further strengthened its relevance. Judicial interpretation expanded the scope of Article 21 from mere protection of life to a constellation of rights including privacy, education, environment and legal aid. The Basic Structure Doctrine ensured that core constitutional values such as democracy, secularism, federalism and judicial review remain immune from majoritarian alteration. Social justice provisions evolved through reservation reforms, constitutional amendments addressing promotion, economic disadvantage and ongoing debates on sub-categorisation. Federalism too has matured through institutional mechanisms like the GST Council and the emphasis on cooperative federalism after economic liberalisation.

Despite these strengths, the Constitution faces serious contemporary challenges. Caste discrimination, manual scavenging and spatial segregation persist despite constitutional prohibitions. The consolidation of executive power threatens the autonomy of constitutional institutions, while preventive detention and emergency-era provisions continue to confer expansive coercive authority on the state. New-age concerns—digital surveillance, algorithmic governance and inadequate data protection—pose fresh risks to privacy and civil liberties. Additionally, tensions between religious freedom and gender justice, and the rise of majoritarian narratives, test the plural ethos embedded in Articles 25 to 30.

The way forward lies not in constitutional revisionism but in constitutional renewal. Strengthening institutional autonomy through transparent appointments and independent funding, expanding constitutional literacy, updating privacy and data protection laws, and enacting comprehensive anti-discrimination frameworks are imperative. A participatory model of federalism and renewed commitment to minority and cultural rights will be crucial in preserving India’s constitutional balance.

In conclusion, India’s Constitution remains a living, transformative document. Its endurance lies in its capacity to combine liberal freedoms with social justice, and stability with adaptability. As India looks toward 2047, constitutional morality, pluralism and equality must continue to guide national progress.